|
Service is effected by people. To achieve service excellence, we must achieve excellence in our people. To achieve excellence in our people, we must achieve excellence in our business processes, give people the right tools, create an environment that promotes high performance and believe in our people.
|
Why Pay for Performance Strategies
Increasing competition for knowledgeable and skilled efficient employees make it now more necessary for corporate organizations to retain its best employees One method is to implement pay for performance strategies to reward good employees on the basis of their work performance. Pay for performance strategies is thus crucial to this current competitive environment for top human resource as the strategies implemented today will lead organizations well into the future with a good set of workforce. Pay for performance strategies aim to identify the key capabilities, skills, contributions of employees and reward them based on meritocracy and work performance in order to deliver its organizational goals of a good employer. Defining and refining the right compensation management program is critical for employee motivation and retention. The adoption of pay for performance strategies in rewarding employees will not only improve the competitive edge of an organization but will also retain the best promising employees to stay in the company. Pay for performance compensation plans increase the motivation of employees, and ultimately increase the performance levels of the company. Employees work harder, help the company perform better and helping organizations develop a high-performance workforce.
What is Pay for Performance Strategies
It is a meritocracy compensation system that gives opportunities and advantages to employees on the basis of their measurable accomplished work performance. It helps to cultivate a performance-oriented culture where employees are focused, productive and appropriately compensated. When an organization embraces meritocracy, they're making a commitment to reward their employees for performance, differentiating between top performers and those who are average or below average. Pay for performance compensation programs linked incentive compensation according to employeee's work performance. The key elements of pay for performance strategies are compensation would cover a combination of monthly or other frequent payments, annual increments, an annual or other infrequent bonus and pay shall comprise of a fixed component which includes basic pay and an additional component in the form of variable payment. Pay increase should reflect improved productivity and work performance in an organization.
How To Structure and Manage a Pay for Performance Strategy Program
In the implementation of pay for performance strategies, measurement of work is a natural part of the analysis control, evaluation and management process. A manager must measure work performance to improve it. If you cannot measure work performance and productivity, you cannot manage productivy. The evaluation of work performance can be qualitative and/or quantitative. Thus, a good performance management system with tools to provide guidelines for managers to recommend salary increase percentages is essential. The philosophy behind pay for performance strategies work culture must be clearly explained to help employees understand objectives of top management that is to foster a top work performance culture which improves the organization wealth. In order for pay for performance strategies to succeed fully, it must involve the cooperation of employers and employees and effective employee communications must be present. An adequate and timely flow of relevant information between employers and employees is important. Effective consultation with employees and their involvement in the decision that affect them is part of the pay for performance management compensation program. The parties should jointly assess the measurement and productivity.
Disadvantages of Pay for Performance Strategies in Organization
Pay for performance strategies are never perfect. Properly rewarding top performers and allocating incentive adjustments across an organization can be difficult, complex, subjective task due to different senior managers using different tools and assessement systems to evaluate their subordinates. This may caused unwanted dissatisfaction among some employees.
|
